Category Archives: Editorial

You Want Us to Do What? The First Day of Architecture School…

by Aric Gitomer, AIA

 

studio

Image taken & altered from Virginia Tech: http://www.archdesign.vt.edu/home/images/home-1.jpg

 

Close to 40 years ago I walked into Cowgill Hall, the School of Architecture building at Virginia Tech. I was directed to what was to be my home for my first year away from home. You might think your dorm room is your home but you would be mistaken! I went down to the basement level to be greeted with a sea of tables in long linear rows with each station delineated by a metal four-legged stool positioned in even divisions. This “design studio” would house half of the first year class of ‘84. As I excitedly walked in to start my journey I randomly selected an area in the middle and took a seat and waited, as did everyone else. No one knew what to expect. Back then no one had the internet to look up anything and the only resource I recall was the school’s published course catalog.

curves

 

 

We all waited and waited and eventually two professors walked in, very late, (I think it was intentional to build up the suspense) and handed everyone a single sheet of a heavy stock paper approximately 18 inches by 24 inches and some balsa wood sticks. We were instructed to create beautiful curves only using those two items. We all looked at each other wondering what is going on. But who were we to question such a request, so we all started manipulating the paper about the stick to create our beautiful curves. As we did what we were instructed the professors walked around and whispered to each other, “what are they saying and why is one snickering”? We also whispered amongst ourselves, psst, what makes a curve beautiful? It would be my understanding that all curves are beautiful. Once we completed the task we had to take out our sketchbooks and draw the beautiful curves and then the negative space the curves formed. These drawing exercises continued and evolved into more and more requests and ended up being the warm-up exercise to get us ready for the next critical step. One professor in a very theatric manner instructed us to go outside and find ourselves a nice twig (not too big) lying about on campus and return. Upon our return our new instruction was to rotate the twig and draw the space formed as we rotated the twig. Not the twig itself, but the actual volume of space formed. The next step was to make it three dimensional model limited to two sources and no glue. Quite a few people took a beating from the professor on the dimensionality of their model. “THIS IS NOT THREE-D”! Until this day I am unclear on the aspect of their criticism. Maybe they just wanted to belittle people. As we worked obscure references were made to individuals unknown to all of us, names such as John Ruskin, Henry Greenough and Thomas Kuhn.

As we created our models out of Strathmore cardboard one poor soul, Ian, decided to put his exacto knife up against the edge of his plastic triangle to cut a straight line into his cardboard. The professor saw what he was doing and that was the end of Ian’s triangle. The professor snatched it away and told him if he did not know how to use his tools correctly he did not deserve to have them! It was so embarrassing and I felt so bad for Ian. But the professor did not stop there because later that same morning he saw Ian drawing a straight line using his triangular architect’s scale. That’s right he seized that as well. Ian was not going to have a good day or week for that matter because he did eventually lose more supplies. We did not see Ian again after the first semester. It was rumored he switched to Accounting.

I never lost anything on that first day or my five years in school for that matter but I will always remember that lesson. I respect all of my tools!

3dmodel

That first day had an incredible influence on me because it unlocked my perception of common things just lying about. Then, as I walked around campus I became more sensitive to details. My world of understanding objects had been transformed. The exercises gave me another dimension of appreciation for an object and how it impacts its surroundings. How did the light affect the space via highlights and shadows? What spaces did the inverse of a solid create? How did the negative and positive voids come together. Spatial relationships and how can I make a connection without any bonding agent. I think about that simple twig until this day. So for me my introduction to architecture via the design studio was quite impactful.

twig

As I reflected back on that inspirational day I wondered what my peers experienced on their first day and what shaped their own journey into the world of architecture. The following are those memories;

I drew my hand.

I did a technical drawing of an exacto knife.

I created a guest house for an existing modernist house.

Our professor had us design a “regeneration unit” another term for a bathroom an exercise in rethinking a common place.

The prompt was when is a box not a box… we had three days to respond.

Had to drop my keys on my desk and explore the patterns.

We took a piece of famous art and made a square, rectilinear representation of it.  Then, from that, we developed a 3-d representation, in the form of a cube.

We had to read Louis Kahn’s “Between Silence and Light” then go out and photographically capture concepts within the book such as Order, Joy, Touch, Site, Wonder et al. (Grad School)

We were required to do sketches of everyday objects (10 a day) for about a week. Then chose one sketch, abstract it, and create a 3D model of the abstraction. I made a “beautiful” abstract 20oz coke bottle out of cardboard.

We had to walk for an hour through town sketching as we walked never letting the pencil leave the paper.

We were given a sheet of paper and instructed to create depth by scoring, cutting or folding.

We were asked to create a model of an object whose “differential was the resultant of a tetrahedron.”

We were called over to a large work table; the professor placed a sweet onion on it. With a grin the professor said something to the effect of, “I’ll be back in 20 minutes and we will discuss the onion and how it can teach you about architecture.”

A bag full of unshelled peanuts was emptied from a sack and then asked “what are these?”

We had to take 10 strips of paper approximately 1” x 18” each and a box of paper clips and construct a tower. No other items could be used.

We had to create a single unit into many and that many would become a new unit.

Professor walk into studio presents a box of computer cards and a bundle of piano wire and tells us to make something architectural

We created a sloped and a flat platform out of chipboard and then with just toothpicks and glue we had to create structures to support bricks.

Take a simple object and make it complex… I turned in a crumpled up piece of paper.

We were handed a hunk of heavy gage copper wire and instructed to make something beautiful.

We give a very complex multiple day project involving the manipulating of two 4”x4” cubes and their intersections to create one object. The assignment involves a two dimension (cruciform) pattern which is to be folded creating a transformation from the abstract to the concrete. Three terms considered are: superposition, twinning and interpenetration.

Students get into small groups of 5-6, and on a large piece of paper (6’ square) draw a series of concentric, freehand circles. One student begins by drawing a circle in graphite, about the size of a fist. The next student attempts to correct the imperfections in that circle by drawing one around it, also in graphite (1” bar of soft graphite). They continue on this way for a few days until the circle is about 4-5 ft. in diameter. We discuss the idea of circle, of what makes a circle, and the tension between the relative and absolute, between the idea of a thing and the forces acting on something coming into the physical world. The project is simple in that everyone knows a circle, but most haven’t spent much time thinking about them. In just a few days, large questions about the role of media, tools, drawing, ideas, geometry, history, and context have been introduced, and these are returned to throughout the year.

The Take Away:

So if you thought you were going to walk into design studio your first day of Architecture School and start designing buildings you would have been sadly mistaken, but the journey they take you on to get there is magical!

You can review additional posts on my blog page:  http://www.aricgitomerarchitect.com/blog/

Aric Gitomer AIA is an architect and sole practitioner in Morris Plains, NJ – Aric Gitomer Architect, LLC. He is a graduate of Virginia Tech and has been practicing architecture for over 30 years. The focus of his current practice is residential design inclusive of alterations, additions and renovations as well as new structures.

Editorial Disclaimer

The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the author(s) and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of AIA NJ or any employee thereof. AIA NJ makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information in this article and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

AIA NJ reserves the right to delete, edit, or alter in any manner it sees fit comments that it, in its sole discretion, deems to be obscene, offensive, defamatory, threatening, in violation of trademark, copyright or other laws, or is otherwise unacceptable.

 

 

WHAT WE’RE UP AGAINST

By Jerome Leslie Eben, FAIA

showpic

 

Please do not let the title of this article scare you. It is not about Zoning or Planning Boards.  It is borrowed from a new off-Broadway play that I saw this past Halloween weekend.   The WP Theater at 2162 Broadway at 76th Street just 40 or so blocks north from the BIG Theater District, though this most enjoyable play should probably move downtown.

Adrienne Campbell- Holt, directs this dark comedy of construction problems and unreconstructed attitudes.  A New York Post article described the play “as the battle of the sexes – not from the casting couch of Hollywood, but from the field of cubicles in an architect’s office.  I knew that I was going to like it from the start because as I walked into the theater, the set included a drafting board, yellow trace, a light box and an electric eraser.  Tools of the trade back in 1992, when the play takes place.

The play written by Theresa Rebeck, follows the story of Eliza (Krysta Rodriguez) a talented architect who has joined a firm, four months earlier.   She has found her chauvinist colleagues do not seem to be able to design themselves better working relationships.  All I know was back in ’89 this male architect told girls ( ok, young women) in my career day presentations that they too can become architects…………and many did!

The run is short; don’t delay. Information for tickets can be had by calling (866) 811-4111 or on their website, by clicking here.

Do not forget to take a male colleague or two. Above all, enjoy the performance!

 

 

 

 

CORNERSTONE Celebrates 30th Anniversary

SOUTH PLAINFIELD, NJ (12 September 2017) – – Cornerstone Architectural Group, LLC, celebrated 30 years in business during a reception at the firm’s Hamilton Boulevard office building. Staff, invited guests, clients, business partners, friends and family gathered at an outdoor social gathering amid tasty treats and favorite beverages. The celebration was highlighted by Borough Council President Derryk C. White, when he presented and read a proclamation from the Mayor’s office congratulating the partners and staff of Cornerstone on their 30th Anniversary.

Ranked by NJ Biz Magazine as one of New Jersey’s top 50 architectural design firms. Cornerstone Architectural Group is a local, design award winning firm that specializes in professional services in architecture, interior design, land planning and construction management. The firm employs a staff of ten at its South Plainfield office. The firm delivers design excellence in public, civic and commercial buildings.

Pictured (left front to right): Firm partners Robert M. Longo, AIA, Robert F. Barranger, AIA and Michael G. Soriano, AIA, receive a special proclamation from Borough Council President Derryck C. White.

In the 5 Years since Hurricane Sandy, AIA-NJ has Increased their Commitment to Resiliency

red_eagle

 

“AIA-NJ is really a model of how to get it done after a disaster.”

~ Illya Azaraoff, AIA

Contributors: Illya Azaraoff, AIA; Bruce Turner, AIA; Justin Mihalik, AIA and Laurence Parisi, AIA Editor: Stacey Kliesch, AIA

 

In 2012, in the weeks and months following Superstorm Sandy, AIA-NJ’s members were getting back on their feet. Many of them located in areas where the storm hit hardest not only were helping their clients to rebuild their homes, but were also figuring out how to rebuild their own. AIA-NJ architects were aware that the State still did not have a plan in place on how to rebuild, and FEMA was months away from updating base flood elevations. So how were homeowners to rebuild?

To make matters worse, the costs for elevating homes and rebuilding were four and five times the amount of available FEMA grants. It was at this time that AIA-NJ Executive Director Joseph Simonetta knew it was imperative for AIA-NJ to be at the forefront of the recovery and the first step was to meet with the Governor’s Office of Rebuilding and Recovery. Joe organized the meeting at the State House and AIA-NJ presented the issues that homeowners were facing approximately $150,000 in structural remediation per structure. Unbeknownst to AIA-NJ, the Governor’s Office was well underway preparing a report on the damage to real estate, infrastructure, and vital buildings.
The result of the meeting and the work of the Governor’s Office was the Reconstruction,
Rehabilitation, Elevation and Mitigation Program (RREM). The program provides up to
$150,000 in grant funding assistance to eligible homeowners to repair or reconstruct their homes. Our Executive Director was vigilant ensuring that the recommendations of AIA-NJ were incorporated into the RREM program, which enabled thousands of residents to rebuild their homes within the following years.

Another achievement of AIA-NJ has been supporting the passing of the Good Samaritan Bill. Until Superstorm Sandy hit, the pushback from the legal community made passage of this bill impossible. In the wake of Sandy, AIA-NJ did not delay in moving on the legislation as the timing was right. Once again, Joe Simonetta knew this bill would be more impactful if the engineers joined on since they too would be performing building assessments along with the architects. Joe initiated lining up sponsors for the bill, drafting the bill and then coordinating the necessary meetings between AIA-NJ and NJ Professional Society of Engineers for the bill’s final language.
AIA-NJ reached out to the the New Jersey State Bar Association and addressed their concerns in order to pave the way for the bill’s passage. Through our executive director’s invaluable relationships with NJ’s key legislator’s, the bill was passed and signed into law by the Governor in 2013. Since passage, this legislation has become a template for other AIA Components as they work to have Good Samaritan legislation passed in their states.

Read more about the Good Samaritan Bill here.
Around the same time, the AIA-NJ Homeland Security Committee, founded by AIA-NJ Continue reading

Hurricane 101 – FOR ARCHITECTS

for nerds, geeks and dreamers

A soliloquy by Laurence E. Parisi, AIA

 

I recall in architectural school at NYIT, there was a special section in the computer department for architects. Established to enable architectural students to complete their course requirements, I was told architect’s logic did not jive with the computer logic and they were at a disadvantage.  Now, these same computer geeks have adopted the title “Architect”, isn’t that curious, and this hypocrisy continues as a trendy adjective for everything.   As a transfer student, I was placed in a computer major section with the real nerdy geeks.  I suffered terribly, however I made it through by the skin of my Sir Banister Fletcher.

 

In today’s meteorological world, amidst all of the specialized technology and computer modeling, we still find ourselves wondering, what the hell is going on with the weather?  Flooded with weather terminology, myths and folk law, I believe it’s prudent for architects to have a sound working knowledge of the essential scientific terms in order to be relevant. Below I’ve listed 12 weather related terms for a basic 101 understanding.  This will encourage a more ambient nature among architects and the scientists. Although in my mind, I still believe we’re better off with the Farmer’s Almanac. There is no real predictability on storms only tracking and a whole lot of “if this and/or if that” all as determined by the will of God.

 

For starters, you should know that the Hurricane season is from June 1 to November 30.  Sandy landed in New Jersey at Atlantic City on October 29, 2012 with winds of 80 mph.  Architects must have a decent understanding of the terms Cat 1 through Cat 5 as it is important and relative to the Saffir-Simpson Scale. See Below:

 

Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale:

The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale is a 1 to 5 categorization based on the hurricane’s intensity at the indicated time. The scale provides examples of the type of damage and impacts in the United States associated with winds of the indicated intensity. Continue reading

Knowing Sandy

By: Susan P Bristol, AIA, NJ PP, LEED AP                                                               spbarch@gmail.com

SPB Architecture LLC, Rocky Hill, NJ

609.924.7989

Spbarchitecture.com

(Adjunct Professor at NJIT, CoA+D, School of Architecture)

 

 

Architecture, having been consumed by the movement toward sustainability in recent decades, now has a new mandate. Resilience.  In post-Sandy NJ (and NJ River basins since the mid 20th century) the questions have been: How do we control water? How do we defend against other natural forces that can and have wreaked devastation? What are our policies toward construction on sites that have flooded multiple times? How do we build for future disasters to protect expensive infrastructure, architecture and neighborhood investment? What is the role of the architect in mitigating disaster?

Now the big question now is: how do we live with water?

Those of us in the ‘trenches’ of designing, building, planning, engineering and construction have been operating on multiple levels. In my Garden State Studio resilient design course at NJIT in Spring of 2013, I began using the term ‘Un-Building’ just after Sandy to think about treading more lightly on fragile (barrier island) ground, in floodplain redevelopment, in dense neighborhoods and coastal constructions. This does not mean do not build or do not re-build, it means that we need to examine our footprints: our constructed and environmental footprints.  If you think that Un-building is a provocative term for a profession that depends on building, then you are correct. It is meant to alert us to the conflicts embedded in our profession and to make us think.

 

The first thing that people think about resiliency after a storm, is that we need to update the building codes (government) and the second thing is how we meet those codes (property owners, architects, engineers, contractors). As I reminded folks at the 2013 Mayor’s Summit (sponsored by the Center for Resilient Design at NJIT), building codes are a minimum, FEMA codes do not even consider sea level rise, and best practice design must take many other factors into account.  Architects are well positioned to add nuance, insight, resiliency and vision to projects beyond the minimal codes.  However, some of those factors, it turns out, include human fragility and emotions.  Recently, the Nobel prize winner in Economics was announced.  Professor Rickard Thaler’s field is behavioral economics. Architects could learn something by his attention to the human component which is not rational.

 

We cannot assume that experiencing Sandy was a ‘wake-up call’ for everyone.  In fact, the emergency recovery mode pushes some to focus on ‘return to normal’, rebuild as before, make it look like nothing happened.  Our professional inclination is to do it better, do it differently, use design to integrate new codes into our work.  At our best, we

Continue reading

Sandy

A Poem by Susan P Bristol, AIA, NJ PP, USGBC  (1.19.14)

 

A footprint shows that we were there

A postcard says ‘wish you were here’.

 

The sandcastle building was there

The waves come in and wash it where?

 

Survey measures, land is here

Sign says, build it there

Sandy comes, land is where?

 

Reclaim lives, here & there

Rebuild homes, site was where?

 

Property lines erased and blurred

There goes here and here goes there.

 

False foundations hold on tight

To capsized land nowhere in sight.


Author’s Bio:

SPB Architecture LLC

Susan Pikaart Bristol      AIA, NJ R.A, LEED AP, NJ P.P.

SPBArchitecture.com  p.o. box 814, rocky hill, nj  08553

spbarch@gmail.com   609.924.7989

 

 

Susan Pikaart Bristol is a member of the AIA, a Registered Architect, NJ Professional Planner and LEED Certified in Green Design.  She is the principal of SPB Architecture LLC, a practice providing master planning and full architectural services, as well as vision plans and landscape design collaborations.  Her work has ranged from regional-scale planning and community design to small structures and residential projects. Susan is a native of NJ and is recognized as a resilient design professional that has contributed to Storm Sandy recovery efforts.  She has two degrees (B.S. Arch & M. Arch) from the University of Virginia in Architecture.  Design excellence and critical thinking are at the core of her professional and educational activities.

SUPER STORM SANDY- FIVE YEARS AFTER   Lessons learned….. or not.

By Laurence E. Parisi, AIA

New Jersey has approximately 141 miles of shore coastline, a substantial amount of land along the Hudson River, and many inland marshy estuaries; a significant amount of these lands in our state are still unsettled and in disrepair from Superstorm Sandy. In retrospect, what have we learned?   On my trips down to the Jersey Shore, I see that many owners of homes, with the financial means, have rebuilt pursuant to FEMA regulations.  Other homes, whose owners may be without the abilities to repair, remain in photo 1uncertain condition. Notably, the more affluent communities appear the same as they did pre-Superstorm; as if they were not pressured to raise their homes during reconstruction. It appears as though most of the home raising occurred in moderate-to-middle income areas.  In the more densely populated coastline towns like Atlantic Highlands, the home raising is not a pretty sight.  It has been a slow process as more homeowners have to reconcile with their own circumstances.   For these owners, dealing with governmental restrictions related to home insurance and FEMA regulations have proven to be an arduous task.

 

Photo 2      Photo 3

 

My office is on the westerly bank of the Hudson River; around here, it appears that that post-Superstorm coastline construction advisories and warnings are not well heeded.  Shortly after Sandy tore apart the coast along the Hudson River, even up North into NewPhoto 4 York State, new buildings are being constructed on the river banks. One of these buildings is directly in front of my office on the Hudson.  

On October 29, 2012, when Sandy was approaching New Jersey, I went to my office early in the morning to tape windows and cover all the drawing boards and computer stations.  This was done in an effort to protect these items from water damage, should the roof have been torn off my building (my office is on the top floor).  The water of the Hudson had already risen over the banks and was 400 feet inland (pictured).  We got the full blast of Sandy when the storm made landfall at around 8:00 PM that evening. when she landed.   At my office building, there were over 3 feet of flood water, from the tidal surge, in the ground floor lobby. The 200-bed hospital and nursing home adjacent to my office had to be evacuated and shut down. A major PSE&G electrical sub-station just north of my office was flooded and damaged.

 

Photo 5Two years after Superstorm Sandy, an outpatient medical facility, ancillary to the hospital, was constructed about 171 feet from the Hudson River coastline; this new building is closer to the Hudson than my office building.  The construction costs had to be a minimum of 15 to 20 million dollars. The soil required a lot of piling. Now, why would anyone build such a critical facility in a location that was inaccessible during, and for days after, Superstorm Sandy? Although the photograph shows a limited amount of raised parking, this building will be largely inaccessible in a similar flood disaster.  

 

In a similar situation, a nearby electrical substation was raised approximately sixty feet above the grade, in order to keep the station at its present location despite the potential for flooding (pictured). Notwithstanding the new raising of the facility, it is still a location vulnerable to flooding and becoming inaccessible.  It seems as though these risks are not adequately being considered.  Additionally, please note the appearance of these buildings that were likely designed by engineers.

photo 6          photo 7

 

The lesson to be learned from Superstorm Sandy is to carefully design and plan for disaster.  There is a practical common sense approach to these situations.  We must be cognizant of the fact that certain critical need facilities like hospitals, power stations, and the like should not be constructed in areas vulnerable to flooding. Good planning and good design is a must in order to make our communities safe and viable.

All photographs are the property of Laurence Parisi, AIA

 

Author Bio:

Laurence Parisi, AIA is a past president of AIA NJ, past president of the Architects League of Northern New Jersey and current and founding Chairman of the AIA NJ Homeland Security Committee.

Editorial Disclaimer

The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the author(s) and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of AIA NJ or any employee thereof. AIA NJ makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information in this article and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

AIA NJ reserves the right to delete, edit, or alter in any manner it sees fit comments that it, in its sole discretion, deems to be obscene, offensive, defamatory, threatening, in violation of trademark, copyright or other laws, or is otherwise unacceptable.

 

Spiezle Architectural Group Announces Significant New Hires and Promotions

Firm Credits Continued Growth to Sustained Strategy Focused on Enhancing

Scope, Depth and Diversity of Client Capabilities

 

HAMILTON, NJ and MEDIA, PA– August 15, 2017 Spiezle Architectural Group, Inc., an award-winning, full-service architectural, interior design and planning firm, is pleased to announce several significant new hires and promotions. The moves illustrate the effective implementation of its sustainable growth strategy driven to consistently enhance the scope, depth and diversity of its client services.

 

The latest additions culminate a team of 59 professionals with extensive architectural, planning and interior design expertise in sectors including K-12 education, higher education, healthcare, senior care, commercial, non-profit, hospitality, sustainability, and government markets.  New employees include Thomas Lee, CPA, Chief Financial Officer/VP of Finance and Administration, James Repka, RA, Project Manager, Courtney Prutzman, Interior Designer, and Chelsea Donnigan, Senior Marketing Coordinator. Promotions include Steven Siegel, AIA, LEEDap to Principal as well as Michelle Lopez and Justin Kozik, LEED GA to Project Coordinators.

 

“I am delighted to welcome our newest professionals and congratulate those who earned a well-deserved promotion,” said Thomas S. Perrino, President and CEO. “Our expanded Spiezle team drives our mission to always strengthen our capabilities to insure optimal performance and client satisfaction.”

Continue reading

Giving Credit Where Credit is Due

On August 14, 2017, a terrific article on the East Point Lighthouse was published in The Daily Journal. Despite the extensive coverage, the architect, AIA NJ Member and Chair of the AIA NJ Historic Resources Committee, Michael Calafati, AIA, was left out of the article.

Read the article by clicking here.

CANstruction at Prudential CenterUpon noticing this, New Jersey Regional Representative to the AIA Strategic Council, Bruce Turner, AIA, sent along a letter to The Daily Journal reminding them of the important role of the architect and recommending an edit to the on line version of the article and a suggestion to always credit the architect when writing about any building.

In a matter of minutes, the The Daily Journal Content Specialist responded to Bruce that the editor was being advised of Bruce’s comments, and AIA National’s Media Relations Sr. Manager, Matt Tinder, sent along his accolades to Bruce for the letter being “perfect – polite, balanced, clear, and direct” and offering his support should the editor not respond.

But Bruce did not need to take Mr. Tinder up on his offer because the very next morning, The Daily Journal featured our Regional Representative’s letter…Read Bruce’s letter here.

What a great moment for Michael Calafati, AIA and architecture!

A special thank you to Bruce D. Turner, AIA for being ever vigilant and a message to all AIA members to be on the lookout for more ways to support our profession and our colleagues in a similar fashion.

Be the Voice of AIA and your profession!